高中数学中的计算思维

Authors

  • 马嘉宁 西北大学经济管理学院,西安 710127,陕西,中国
  • 唐佳怡 (通讯作者) 西北大学经济管理学院,西安 710127,陕西,中国

关键词:

计算思维(CT); 人工智能(AI); 高中; 数学; 问题解决

摘要

本文综述计算思维(Computational Thinking,CT)与人工智能(Artificial Intelligence,AI)在高中数学教育中的融合。计算思维包含分解、模式识别、抽象与算法设计,为求解复杂问题提供了一套结构化框架。ChatGPT 与 Gemini 扮演“计算思维者”的角色,能够解读问题,并运用逻辑、抽象与模式识别,在多个领域模拟类人推理;相形之下,Wolfram Alpha、GeoGebra、Symbolab、Desmos 等高级数学软件是执行精确数学计算与可视化的专门工具,但缺乏思考与情境适应的能力。ChatGPT 与 Gemini 帮助使用者理解并探索问题,数学软件则依据既定输入精确求解。数学问题解决始终是教育与技术进步的基础要素。计算思维培育逻辑推理与创造力,人工智能则借助自动化与智能系统实现对数学概念的高效探索。这一融合不仅支撑更深层的概念理解,也有助于教育者针对多样的学习需求调整教学。本综述提炼出三条关键主题:(1)融入人工智能可提升学生的数学表现;(2)由人工智能支撑的游戏化学习(GBL)能够增强学习投入;(3)计算思维的发展能够强化数学推理。

Abstract

This literature review explores the integration of Computational Thinking (CT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in high school mathematics education. CT - which involves decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, and algorithm design - provides a structured framework for solving complex problems. ChatGPT and Gemini function as computational thinkers, capable of interpreting problems and using logic, abstraction, and pattern recognition to simulate human-like reasoning across domains. In contrast, advanced mathematical software such as Wolfram Alpha, GeoGebra, Symbolab, and Desmos are specialized tools designed to perform exact mathematical computations and visualizations, but they lack the ability to think or adapt contextually. While ChatGPT and Gemini help users understand and explore problems, math software precisely solves them based on defined inputs. Mathematical problem-solving remains a foundational element of both education and technological advancement. CT fosters logical reasoning and creativity, while AI enables efficient exploration of mathematical concepts through automation and intelligent systems. This integration not only supports deeper conceptual understanding but also helps educators tailor instruction to diverse learning needs. The review highlights three key themes: (1) AI integration improves students' performance in mathematics; (2) game-based learning (GBL) supported by AI increases engagement; and (3) CT development strengthens mathematical reasoning.

References

[1] 赵国忠. 校长领导力提升实践策略. 教学与管理, 2021(24): 11-14.

[2] 陈劲. 研究生科研创新能力培养模式. 研究生教育研究, 2021(04): 45-51.

[3] 岳伟. 生态文明教育课程建构与实施. 环境教育, 2021(07): 26-30.

[4] 韩俊强. 民办教育规范高质量发展路径. 民办教育研究, 2021(04): 15-22.

[5] Weng X, Ye H, Ng O L. Integrating artificial intelligence and computational thinking in educational contexts: A systematic review of instructional design and student learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2024, 62(6).

[6] Clarke D, Roche A. Using contextualized tasks to engage students in meaningful and worthwhile mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 2018, 51: 95-108.

[7] 李艺铭. 青少年媒介素养教育开展路径. 现代传播 (中国传媒大学学报), 2020, 43(08): 156-160.

[8] 左崇良. 县域教师轮岗制度落地难点破解. 教师发展研究, 2021, 5(03): 68-74.

[9] 张帆. 体育教育体质提升课程改革. 北京体育大学学报, 2021, 44(06): 112-120.

[10] 吴岩. 新工科背景下高校教学改革. 中国大学教学, 2020(07): 8-13.

[11] Huang X, Qiao C. Enhancing computational thinking skills through artificial intelligence education at a STEAM high school. Science & Education, 2022, 33: 383-403.

[12] 徐辉. 教育对外开放提质升级路径. 西南大学学报 (社会科学版), 2022, 47(04): 120-128.

[13] 于泽元. 项目式学习课堂实践设计. 全球教育展望, 2021, 50(10): 45-56.

[14] 刘海峰. 高考改革历史经验与未来走向. 厦门大学学报 (哲学社会科学版), 2021(04): 110-118.

[15] Chen S Y, Lai Y H, Lin Y S. Research on head-mounted virtual reality and computational thinking experiments to improve the learning effect of AIoT maker course: Case of earthquake relief scenes. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, 11: 1164.

[16] Hsu T C, Chang C, Lin Y W. Effects of voice assistant creation using different learning approaches on performance of computational thinking. Computers & Education, 2023, 192: 104657.

Downloads

发布日期

2026-08-08

How to Cite

马嘉宁, 唐佳怡. 高中数学中的计算思维. 教育发展与创新前沿. 2026, 4(3): 63-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/fedi28.