青少年智能手机成瘾与心理韧性关系的考察
关键词:
智能手机成瘾; 心理韧性; 青少年; 数字风险行为; 保护性因素摘要
本研究旨在从若干变量出发,考察青少年心理韧性与智能手机成瘾之间的关系。研究在量化研究取向的框架下设计,采用相关性调查模型实施。研究数据取自土耳其两个省份的 267 名在校学生,以《简短心理韧性量表》与《智能手机成瘾量表》为数据收集工具,并运用描述性分析、独立样本 t 检验与单因素方差分析进行数据处理。结果显示:青少年的心理韧性水平高于中等,而智能手机成瘾水平相对较高;男生的心理韧性显著高于女生,但成瘾水平在性别上不存在显著差异。此外,随着年级升高,智能手机成瘾水平下降;心理韧性对智能手机成瘾具有显著的负向预测作用,可解释成瘾变异量的 7.8%。建议把旨在增强心理韧性的心理教育内容系统地纳入学校辅导服务,并建议未来研究从多来源收集数据,把情境变量纳入模型。Abstract
The aim of this study is to examine the relational relationship between adolescent psychological resilience and smartphone addiction in terms of certain variables. The research was designed within the framework of a quantitative research approach and conducted using a correlational survey model. Research data were collected from 267 students studying in two different provinces in Turkey. The Short Psychological Resilience Scale and the Smartphone Addiction Scale were used as data collection tools in the research. Descriptive analyses, Independent Samples t-Test, and One-Way ANOVA were used in the analysis of the data. The findings showed that adolescents' psychological resilience levels were above average, while their smartphone addiction was relatively high; that boys had higher psychological resilience than girls, but that addiction levels did not differ significantly according to gender. In addition, it was determined that smartphone addiction decreased as the grade level increased, and that psychological resilience negatively and significantly predicted smartphone addiction, explaining 7.8% of the variance in addiction. It is recommended that psychoeducational content aimed at strengthening psychological resilience be systematically integrated into guidance services. It is also recommended to collect data from multiple sources and include contextual variables in the model.References
[1] 褚宏启. 教育公平与教育质量协同发展. 教育理论与实践, 2024, 41(21): 4-8.
[2] 周光礼. 高校学科建设与科研育人融合. 大学教育科学, 2021(04): 36-44.
[3] 郑金洲. 校本教研提质增效实施策略. 上海教育科研, 2022(08): 5-10.
[4] 刘昌亚. 义务教育课后服务长效管理机制. 基础教育, 2021(08): 14-18.
[5] 丁钢. 传统文化融入现代教育的路径探索. 华东师范大学学报 (教育科学版), 2025, 39(04): 1-10.
[6] 许晓东. 高校实验室育人功能挖掘. 实验技术与管理, 2021, 38(07): 210-215.
[7] 沈建华. 劳动教育课程体系开发与实践. 中国教育学刊, 2022(09): 84-88.
[8] 彭刚. 通识教育课程体系优化建设. 清华大学教育研究, 2021, 42(03): 1-8.
[9] 孙杰远. 民族地区教育现代化推进策略. 广西师范大学学报 (哲学社会科学版), 2021, 59(03): 108-115.
[10] 焦建利. 微课赋能课堂教学创新. 中国信息技术教育, 2020(16): 18-22.
[11] 王璐. 境外基础教育改革经验借鉴. 外国教育研究, 2021, 48(07): 3-16.
[12] 田慧生. 区域教育治理现代化建设路径. 教育科学研究, 2020(08): 5-11.
[13] 庞丽娟. 学前普惠教育扩容提质路径. 学前教育研究, 2021(07): 3-13.
[14] 赵国忠. 校长领导力提升实践策略. 教学与管理, 2021(24): 11-14.
[15] 陈劲. 研究生科研创新能力培养模式. 研究生教育研究, 2022(04): 45-51.
[16] 岳伟. 生态文明教育课程建构与实施. 环境教育, 2021(07): 26-30.
[17] 韩俊强. 民办教育规范高质量发展路径. 民办教育研究, 2022(04): 15-22.
[18] 李艺铭. 青少年媒介素养教育开展路径. 现代传播 (中国传媒大学学报), 2025, 43(08): 156-160.
[19] 左崇良. 县域教师轮岗制度落地难点破解. 教师发展研究, 2021, 5(03): 68-74.
[20] 张帆. 体育教育体质提升课程改革. 北京体育大学学报, 2021, 44(06): 112-120.
[21] 吴岩. 新工科背景下高校教学改革. 中国大学教学, 2024(07): 8-13.
[22] 徐辉. 教育对外开放提质升级路径. 西南大学学报 (社会科学版), 2021, 47(04): 120-128.
[23] 于泽元. 项目式学习课堂实践设计. 全球教育展望, 2021, 50(10): 45-56.
[24] 刘海峰. 高考改革历史经验与未来走向. 厦门大学学报 (哲学社会科学版), 2021(04): 110-118.
[25] Karakose T, Tülübaş T, Papadakis S. Revealing the intellectual structure and evolution of digital addiction research: An integrated bibliometric and science mapping approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(22): 14883.
[26] Yu S, Sussman S. Does smartphone addiction fall on a continuum of addictive behaviors? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(2): 422.
[27] Chen J H, Tong K K, Wu A M S, et al. The comorbidity of gambling disorder among Macao adult residents and the moderating role of resilience and life purpose. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15(12): 2774.
[28] Wu J, Shao Y, Zang W, et al. Is physical exercise associated with reduced adolescent social anxiety mediated by psychological resilience? Evidence from a longitudinal multi-wave study in China. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 2025, 19(1): 17.
[29] Li M, Huang Y, Sun M. Exploring the structural links between peer support, psychological resilience, and exercise adherence in adolescents: A multigroup model across gender and educational stages. BMC Public Health, 2025, 25(1): 2300.
[30] Baldwin C A, Nasırcı H. Technological advancements and international organizations in education: A comparative study of China and Myanmar in the context of deglobalization. Anatolian Turkish Journal of Education, 2024, 6(3): 313-333.
[31] Li Z, Shi L, Cai X. Smartphone addiction is more harmful to adolescents than internet gaming disorder: Divergence in the impact of parenting styles. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13: 1044190.
[32] Subramaniam M, Koh Y S, Sambasivam R, et al. Problematic smartphone use and mental health outcomes among Singapore residents: The health and lifestyle survey. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 2024, 98: 104124.
[33] Yao W, Hou H, Yang P, et al. The co-occurrence of adolescent smartphone addiction and academic burnout: The role of smartphone stress and digital flourishing. Education and Information Technologies, 2025, 30(4): 4987-5007.
[34] Li Q, Liu Z. Parental psychological control and adolescent smartphone addiction: Roles of reactance and resilience. BMC Psychology, 2025, 13(1): 139.
[35] Coskun E. An investigation of the relationship between academic self-efficacy, achievement motivation, and smartphone addiction. International Journal on Studies in Education, 2025, 7(4): 959-977.
[36] El-Shihy D. A mixed-methods study of social media addiction in Egyptian Gen Z: Psychological, educational, and academic consequences and intervention pathways. Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Language, 2026, 6(1): 223-247.
[37] Fischer-Grote L, Kothgassner O D, Felnhofer A. Risk factors for problematic smartphone use in children and adolescents: A review of existing literature. Neuropsychiatrie, 2019, 33(4): 179.