史考与剧释相统一:中国古典戏曲文学中纺织史料的方法论探索

Authors

  • 宋浩宇 (通讯作者) 山东大学经济学院,济南 250100,山东,中国
  • 曹嘉宁 山东大学经济学院,济南 250100,山东,中国

关键词:

古典戏曲文学; 纺织史料; 纺织现象; 史学研究方法; 戏史互证

摘要

本文将中国古典戏曲文学中纺织现象与纺织史料的关系置于文学、历史与纺织的多重视野之下,提出“史考与剧释相统一”的目标导向,阐释古典戏曲文学中纺织现象的史料性质及纺织史料的获取过程,并探讨纺织史料“多维互参”的作用机制。本文认为,基于中国古典戏曲文学中纺织史料的形成机制,其正向过程是纺织现象的史学阐释,逆向过程则是纺织史实的文学佐证。相应的逻辑体系试图回答“中国古典戏曲文学何以成为中国古代纺织研究的史料库”这一问题,并有望概括从各类古典文学作品中提取与研究纺织史料的共同规律。

Abstract

This paper puts the relationship between textile phenomena and textile historical materials in Chinese classical dramatic literature under the perspective of literature, history and textiles, introduces the goal orientation of "unifying historical-research and drama-interpretation", explains the nature of textile phenomena in classical dramatic literature, and the process of obtaining textile historical materials, and discusses the mechanism of "multi-dimensional mutual reference" of textile historical materials. The methodology believes that based on the mechanism of textile historical materials in Chinese classical dramatic literature, the positive process is the historical interpretation of textile phenomena, while the reverse process is the literary evidence of textile historical facts. The corresponding logical system attempts to solve the problem of "why Chinese classical dramatic literature has become a historical database for Chinese ancient textile research", and is expected to summarize the common regulations of extracting and studying the historical materials of textiles in various types of classical literary works.

References

[1] 邓曦, 钟华. 历史研究应加强史料的辨析与辨析. 理论建设, 2016(2): 146-147.

[2] 黄伟. 从翦伯赞的史学评论看文史关系——以翦伯赞历史剧评论为中心. 史学月刊, 2015(3): 132-136.

[3] 康晓. 诗史互诠——以陈寅恪《读〈莺莺传〉》为例. 佳木斯职业学院学报, 2015(5): 70, 78.

[4] Smith J. Historical narrative and literary imagination: Rethinking the boundaries between fact and fiction. Journal of Historical Studies, 2012, 45(3): 212-230.

[5] 颜湘君. 形与神的和谐之美——中国古代小说服饰描写论. 湘潭师范学院学报(社会科学版), 2001, 23(1): 120-124.

[6] 杨立. 二重证据法局限性的思考——兼论多重证据法演进的必然性. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2014, 35(4): 185-188.

[7] Brown L Taylor M. Interdisciplinary approaches to textual criticism: The role of literary evidence in historical reconstruction. Comparative Literature and History, 2015, 28(2): 98-115.

[8] Johnson R. Poetry as historical source: Methodological reflections on the mutual verification of literary and historical materials. East Asian Cultural Review, 2018, 12(4): 156-173.

[9] 赵德波. 诗史互证说文化渊源追溯. 北方论丛, 2010(3): 1-5.

[10] 宗白华. 论中国文学批评中的诗史互证. 文学(理论版), 2011(6): 27-28.

Downloads

发布日期

2026-08-05

How to Cite

宋浩宇, 曹嘉宁. 史考与剧释相统一:中国古典戏曲文学中纺织史料的方法论探索. 社科与人文前沿. 2026, 4(1): 73-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/fssh9.