中华传统营建生态智慧的当代价值转译:徽派建筑与文化自信的关联机制研究
关键词:
徽派建筑; 生态基因; 文化自信; 关联机制; 价值转译; 营建生态智慧摘要
文化自信作为民族发展的深层精神动力,其建构过程需要依托中华优秀传统文化资源的系统性阐释与当代转化。徽派建筑作为中华传统建筑体系的重要分支,蕴含着丰富的营建生态智慧,是彰显中华文明独特魅力的关键文化符号。然而,既有研究对徽派建筑的考察多集中于艺术风格、构造技术与遗产保护等内部维度,缺乏从文化自信传播视角展开的跨学科关联研究。本研究整合了建筑现象学、批判地域主义、文化符号学与社会记忆理论等跨学科资源,构建“生态基因解码—价值重构—文化自信提升”的三元理论框架。通过对徽派建筑自然适应性基因、材料工艺生态基因与文化传承生态基因的学理阐释,本研究揭示了徽派建筑生态基因经由场所精神守护、在地性伦理实践与装饰符号编码等路径参与文化认同建构的内在逻辑。研究表明,徽派建筑营建生态智慧不仅是一种前现代的环境适应性技术知识,更是一种嵌入在物质空间中的文化基因,其当代价值转译对于文化强省战略实施与中国文化符号的国际传播具有重要学术参照意义。Abstract
Cultural confidence, as a deep-seated spiritual driving force for national development, requires the systematic interpretation and contemporary transformation of excellent traditional Chinese cultural resources for its construction. Huizhou architecture, as an important branch of the traditional Chinese architectural system, contains rich ecological construction wisdom and is a key cultural symbol showcasing the unique charm of Chinese civilization. However, existing research on Huizhou architecture mainly focuses on internal dimensions such as artistic style, construction techniques, and heritage protection, lacking interdisciplinary research from the perspective of cultural confidence dissemination. This study integrates interdisciplinary resources such as architectural phenomenology, critical regionalism, cultural semiotics, and social memory theory to construct a three-dimensional theoretical framework of "ecological gene decoding—value reconstruction—enhancement of cultural confidence." Through a theoretical interpretation of the natural adaptability genes, material and technological ecological genes, and cultural heritage ecological genes of Huizhou architecture, this study reveals the inherent logic of how the ecological genes of Huizhou architecture participate in the construction of cultural identity through pathways such as the protection of place spirit, local ethical practices, and the encoding of decorative symbols. The research shows that the ecological wisdom of Huizhou architecture is not only a pre-modern form of environmentally adaptive technology, but also a cultural gene embedded in material space. Its contemporary value translation has significant academic reference value for the implementation of the strategy of building a culturally strong province and the international dissemination of Chinese cultural symbols.References
[1] 张十庆. 徽州建筑. 东南大学出版社, 南京, 2010.
[2] 程极悦. 徽州古建筑修缮技术. 安徽科学技术出版社, 合肥, 2013.
[3] FRAMPTON K. Towards a Critical Regionalism: Six Points for an Architecture of Resistance. FOSTER H. The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture. Seattle: Bay Press, 1983: 16-30.
[4] 吴良镛. 人居环境科学导论. 中国建筑工业出版社, 北京, 2001.
[5] HALL S. Cultural Identity and Diaspora. RUTHERFORD J. Identity: Community, Culture, Difference. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1990: 222-237.
[6] HALL S. Encoding/Decoding. Culture, Media, Language. London: Hutchinson, 1980: 128-138.
[7] BOURDIEU P. The Forms of Capital. RICHARDSON J G. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood, 1986: 241-258.
[8] GRAMSCI A. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. HOARE Q, NOWELL SMITH G. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1971: 323-333.
[9] HALBWACHS M. On Collective Memory. COSER L A. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992: 22-49.
[10] 王其亨. 风水理论研究. 天津大学出版社, 天津, 1992: 15-38.
[11] 王其亨. 清代皇家园林舆图学研究. 建筑学报, 2005, 52(8): 66-71.
[12] HEIDEGGER M. Poetry, Language, Thought. HOFSTADTER A. New York: Harper & Row, 1971: 143-161.
[13] BACHELARD G. The Poetics of Space. JOLAS M. Boston: Beacon Press, 1969: 3-16.
[14] NORBERG-SCHULZ C. Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. New York: Rizzoli, 1980: 5-18.
[15] NAESS A. The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement. Inquiry, 1973, 16(1): 95-100.
[16] 余谋昌. 生态哲学. 陕西人民教育出版社, 西安, 2000.
[17] 刘敦桢. 中国住宅概说. 中国建筑工业出版社. 北京, 1990: 112-135.
[18] 张仲一. 徽州明代住宅. 建筑工程出版社, 北京, 1957.
[19] 程极悦. 徽派建筑技艺传承研究. 建筑学报, 2012, 57(3): 88-93.
[20] 单军. 徽州古村落保护与可持续发展研究. 城市规划, 2008, 32(5): 45-51.
[21] 阮仪三. 江南古镇保护与开发. 同济大学出版社, 上海, 2010.
[22] 陆林, 凌善金, 焦华富, 等. 徽州古村落的演化过程及其机理. 地理研究, 2004, 23(1): 87-95.
[23] 柳肃. 湘西民居建筑形态研究. 长沙: 湖南大学出版社, 2008: 78-85.
[24] FRAMPTON K. Modern Architecture: A Critical History. 4th ed. London: Thames & Hudson, 2020: 314-327.
[25] 李砚祖. 装饰之道. 中国人民大学出版社, 北京, 1993: 156-168.
[26] 罗兰·巴尔特. 符号学原理. 李幼蒸, 译. 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 北京, 1999: 48-62.
[27] 潘谷西. 中国建筑史. 6版. 中国建筑工业出版社, 北京, 2009: 245-250.
[28] 田自秉. 中国纹样史. 高等教育出版社, 北京, 2003: 312-318.
[29] DAWKINS R. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976: 189-201.
[30] POLANYI M. The Tacit Dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966: 4-25.
[31] 常青. 建筑人类学视角下的传统营造技艺传承. 建筑学报, 2015, 60(9): 1-7.
[32] 本雅明. 机械复制时代的艺术作品. 王才勇, 译. 北京: 中国城市出版社, 2002: 56-72.
[33] APPADURAI A. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. 康敏, 译. 新华出版社, 北京, 2016: 15-38.
[34] FORRESTER J. Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1961: 78-95.
[35] HOLLING C S. Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973, 4: 1-23.
[36] FORRESTER J W. Industrial Dynamics: A Major Breakthrough for Decision Makers. Harvard Business Review, 1958, 36(4): 37-66.
[37] 哈布瓦赫. 论集体记忆. 毕然, 郭金华, 译. 上海人民出版社, 上海, 2002: 68-89.
[38] 巴什拉. 空间的诗学. 张逸婧, 译. 上海译文出版社, 上海, 2013: 5-23.
[39] 宗白华. 美学散步. 上海人民出版社, 上海, 1981: 23-45.
[40] SPIVAK G C. Can the Subaltern Speak?. NELSON C, GROSSBERG L. Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1988: 271-313.